More than 84% were satisfied or very satisfied with the aesthetic result. More than half of the study group reported no decline in physical fitness or social contacts in the direct postoperative period. Overview and forecasts on current issues Industry and market perspectives and forecasts Key figures and classifications about companies and products Perspectives and preferences of consumers and brands in various sectors Detailed information on political and social issues All key figures about countries and regions Market forecasts and expert KPIs for more than 1000 markets in more than 190 countries and territories Information on consumer attitudes and behavior around the world Business information about more than 100 million public and private companies Detailed information on more than 39,000 online stores and markets Direct access data for 170 industries in more than 150 countries and more than 1 million. Get quick analyses with our professional research service Show information about sources Show information about the publisher Use Ask Statista Research Service Worth It Ratings are expressed as a percentage; for example, a Worth It rating of 80% means that 8 out of 10 patients would do it again.
Health professionals and hospitals only have access to basic statistics. Some of the public and commercial entities that offer performance-based reimbursement programs, such as the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Blue Cross of California, already use patient satisfaction reports as one of the indicators to determine the quality of care provided by their plan providers. No study has yet investigated the differences in satisfaction between reconstructive and aesthetic surgical procedures. With the exception of facial cosmetic surgery, which included 36 studies and represented 20% of the entire review, other surgical topics were significantly underrepresented.
The high cost, improvements in the algorithms of competing review sites, loss of ownership of expertise, and growing alternative opportunities to generate online content may lead plastic surgeons to abandon this platform for others. Surgeons' excellent communication skills can build trust and generate high overall patient satisfaction, as well as providing an important basis in the event of an unwanted outcome. Making data on satisfaction outcomes available to everyone will promote competition between providers and health systems, allowing market forces to be harnessed to reduce care costs and offer patients the best quality of care for their money. This was done to assess how satisfaction research has changed over the past 15 years, as well as to examine how satisfaction research differs in U.S.
institutions from research conducted outside the United States. A large proportion of satisfaction studies (58%) focused on breast surgery, while satisfaction outcomes have received less attention in other subspecialties of plastic surgery. The field of cosmetic surgery is growing in all areas, from minimally invasive procedures, such as body sculpting, to more complicated surgeries, such as tummy tuck. Levels of satisfaction with functional and psychological outcomes were each measured in 73 studies (41%) and 38 studies (21%), respectively.
Likewise, the unsatisfactory aesthetic result was the most cited factor in a review with a low score in all procedures, most frequently in patients undergoing rhytidectomy (100%) and oral fat removal (100%). By creating more comprehensive tools for determining accurate rates of quality of life and patient satisfaction, the field of plastic surgery will advance even further.
